"March 2, 2005 - The most recently published issue of The Journal of Sex Research (November, 2004) features a study conducted by Kim Bartholomew, Doug Oram, and Jessica L. Stanley.

The authors urge researchers to adopt a new definition of adult/child sexual encounters: Child Sexual Experience (CSE). This new definition takes into account the positive, non-coercive experiences that many young men feel during sexual encounters with older males.

The authors propose a new term, "Child Sexual Experience" (CSE) to "more accurately" describe the impact that a childhood sex experience has on the person. They do not believe that consensual, non-coercive sexual encounters between adults and minors are necessarily harmful-- and in some cases, especially those involving homosexual or bisexual boys in a sexual relationship with an older man, the experience may even be positive.

The authors note that the redefining of Child Sexual Abuse to Child Sexual Experience has important relevance to young gay males. "Some in the gay community believe that some sexual experiences involving mature adolescents and older partners may be beneficial. ... These sexual experiences may provide these adolescents with the opportunity to explore their sexuality and feel affirmed by the gay community. ... It may be less threatening for young gay males to seek out an older gay male than to risk rejection and possible humiliation from making sexual advances toward a peer."

http://www.narth.com/docs/canadian.html

Next up onna fag agenda--provez ta da werl dat lil boyz likez bein fagged-up an abolizhez lawz ginzt peddofeelia, eh?

Den, afta dat, gitz strate ta dizkriminatin ginzt non-fagz, hoo day don likez bein roun:

"An Australian hotel popular with gay men has won the right to refuse entry to heterosexuals and lesbians, officials and the owner said Monday....

The hotel predominantly markets itself towards homosexual males, towards gay men and we want to protect the integrity of the venue as well as continue to make the men feel comfortable," McFeely said.

"When large numbers of heterosexuals or even lesbians are in the hotel that changes the atmosphere and many gay men can feel uncomfortable."

He said he expected a backlash from other patrons, but added: "I'm not worried about it because to be frank I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think."

http://gaynotok.mojblog.rs/arhiva-5-2007.html

An heea I thotz alla deez homoz wuz "bruthaz an siztaz" in day struggoz, eh? Gezz not: "I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think."

So much fo "sivvo ritez" an "non-dizriminazhun," eh? Wedda er not dem thangz be gud er bad all deepenz on hoo dizkriminatin ginzt hoo, it seemz.

"The effort to abolish "age of consent" laws has been a long-time goal of homosexual activists. The 1972 Gay Rights Platform, for example, called for the abolition of all laws prohibiting sex with children. The platform demands: "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent."

In a speech given before a homosexual group in Mexico in 1998, Thorstad said: "Pederasty is the main form that male homosexuality has acquired throughout Western civilization-and not only in the West! Pederasty is inseparable from the high points of Western culture-ancient Greece and the Renaissance." (David Thorstad, "Pederasty And Homosexuality," NAMBLA web site)

The effort to push adult/child sex... is part of the overall homosexual movement. As author Mary Eberstadt wrote in "Pedophilia Chic: Reconsidered" in The Weekly Standard, (Jan. 1, 2001): "The reason why the public is being urged to reconsider boy pedophilia is that this 'question,' settled though it may be in the opinions and laws of the rest of the country, is demonstrably not yet settled within certain parts of the gay rights movement." Eberstadt notes that as the homosexual movement becomes more mainstream, this "question" about adult/child sex will become more prominent.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20 ... xposed.htm

Yup, and Barney Frank loves this stuff.

"At a high school in prosperous Newton, Massachusetts, it’s “To B GLAD Day”—or, less delicately, Transgender, Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian Awareness Day. An advocacy session for students and teachers features three self-styled transgendered individuals—a member of the senior class and two recent graduates. Only in liberal Massachusetts could a public school endorse such an event for teens, you might think. But you would be wrong.

For the last decade or so, largely working beneath public or parental notice, a well-organized movement has sought to revolutionize the curricula and culture of the nation’s public schools. Its aim: to stamp out “hegemonic heterosexuality”—the traditional view that heterosexuality is the norm—in favor of a new ethos that does not just tolerate homosexuality but instead actively endorses experimenting with it...

This movement to “queer” the public schools, as activists put it, originated with a shift in the elite understanding of homosexuality. During the eighties, when gay activism first became a major cultural force, homosexual leaders launched a campaign that mirrored the civil rights movement. To claim their rights, homosexuals argued (without scientific evidence) that their orientation was a genetic inheritance, like race, and thus deserved the same kind of civil protections the nation had guaranteed to blacks. An inborn, unchangeable fact, after all, could not be subject to moral disapproval. There ensued a successful effort to normalize homosexuality throughout the culture, including a strong push for homosexual marriage, gays in the military, and other signs of civic equality.

But even as the homosexual-rights campaign won elite endorsement and lavish funding, even as supportive organizations proliferated, the gay movement began to split internally. By the early nineties, many gay activists viewed goals such as gay marriage or domestic partner unions as lamely “assimilationist”—an endorsement of standards of behavior that “queers,” as they called themselves, should reject as oppressively “straight.” And they militantly began defending the “queer lifestyle” not as an ineluctable fate but as the result of a fully conscious choice.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_2_q ... hools.html

Wut? Fagz aint blamin heredity no mo, but deefenz "the queer lifestyle.. as the result of a fully conscious choice."

So, now den, day wanz da chillinz ta choozez it? Figgaz, eh, da peddafilez, dem.

Ya gotta lernz dem 12-yeea olez, eh?:

"On March 25, a statewide conference, called "Teach-Out," was sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network...Teenagers and children as young as 12 were encouraged to come from around the state, and many were bussed in from their home districts. Homosexual activists from across the country were also there...

One music teacher who attended out of curiosity said that she could not sleep for several nights afterwards and had nightmares about it."

A lil sampo a da lernin:

"Michael Gaucher: "What orifices are we talking about?"

Student: [hesitation]

Michael Gaucher: "Don’t be shy, honey; you can do it."

Student: "Your mouth."

Michael Gaucher: "Okay."

Student: "Your ass."

Michael Gaucher: "There you go!"

===

"The first question was read by Julie Netherland, "What’s fisting?"

A student answered this question by informing the class that "fisting" is when you put your "whole hand into the ass or pussy" of another. When a few of the students winced, the Department of Public Health employee offered, "A little known fact about fisting: you don’t make a fist like this. It’s like this." He formed his hand into the shape of a tear drop rather than a balled fist. He informed the children that it was much easier.

At this point, a youngster of about 16 asked why someone would want to do that. He stated that if the hand were pulled out quickly, the whole thing didn’t sound very appealing to him. Margot Abels was quick to point out that although fisting "often gets a really bad rap," it usually isn’t about the pain, "not that we’re putting that down."

====

We aint puttin down no pane win it kumz ta wun perv rammin hiz fizt up annudda pervz azz, eh?

===

"Margot Abels informed all of the young girls that, indeed, you can rub your "clitori" together, either with or without clothes and "you can definitely orgasm from it." Michael Gaucher told the kids that "there is a name for this: tribadism," which he wrote on the board and told one girl who looked about 14 to "bring that vocabulary word back to Bedford." Julie Netherland informed the children that it wasn’t too difficult because, "When you are sexually aroused, your clit gets bigger."

===

One participant remarked half-way through that Margot Abels just wasn’t "talking to" her, since she, the participant, was a lesbian, middle school teacher. She wanted to know specifically what she could do to facilitate discussions about homosexuality in middle school. This was solved in another session entitled, "Struggles & Triumphs of Including Homosexuality in a Middle School Curriculum."

Christine L. Hoyle, Special Education Teacher and workshop presenter, told the story of how she turned the holocaust portion of her curriculum into a gay affirming section.

Ms. Hoyle allowed the group at the conference to watch a video which she had her students produce and which was narrated by a seventh grade girl. This girl told the audience that ancient Greeks "encouraged homosexuals; in fact, it was considered normal for an adolescent boy to have an older, wiser man as his lover." Thus, this teacher informed her adolescent students that it is okay if an older man approaches them for sexual gratification.

===

I wunnaz if eny a dem dare fag-azz GLSEN teechaz gotz ta takez wunna dem 12-yeea ole boyz out inna da buzhez afta da "teech-out," eh? Den day kud rilly lernz em gud, I spekz.

http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/200 ... istrep.htm

"GLSEN constantly emphasizes the need for tolerance for homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism, but if someone bucks the LGBT party line in a school that follows it, watch out...Chambers decided one day to express his values and wore to school a sweatshirt with the words STRAIGHT PRIDE emblazoned across the front and an image of a man and woman holding hands on the back.

The school principal found this expression of support for heterosexuality unacceptable. He forbade Chambers from wearing the sweatshirt in school, explaining that another student had found it offensive."

http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_2_q ... hools.html

Hmmm, I wunna wut kinda perv wud finez dat swetshert "offenzive," eh? Probly sum NAMBLA memba, strate bak frum flouzin roun in sum gay pride parade, eh? Fagz be offended by, an aint gunna tollaratez, no non-fagz. Yo eeda a fag, er elze ya aint gunna be lowed ta sez nuthin, win day haz day way.

"The parents then filed a federal lawsuit, claiming that the school had squelched their son’s First Amendment rights. When a preliminary judgment came down in Chambers’s favor, the principal announced over the school public address system that the court had actually agreed with school officials that the sentiment of “straight pride” seemed intolerant toward homosexuality and...the school could prohibit it again."

If "strate pride" be intollarint, den wuzz gay pride, I wunnaz?

"The keynote speaker at GLSEN’s 2000 conference was Robert Chase, president of the 2.7 million-member National Education Association, the nation’s biggest, most powerful teachers’ union. The program booklet for the event featured greetings not only from Chase but from then-president Clinton, Chicago mayor Richard Daley, and the head of the American Federation of Teachers, the second-biggest U.S. teachers’ union. The celebratory notes expressed the kind of praise once reserved for groups like the Boy Scouts. A long list of well-known organizations has backed LGBT programs in the classroom, including the American Psychiatric Association, the American Library Association, and the National Association of Social Workers.

No organization has been more steadfast in its support of GLSEN than the NEA. During the NEA’s annual convention in July 2001, many observers expected the teachers’ union to pass an official resolution incorporating GLSEN’s sweeping educational goals into K–12 curricula nationwide. As it turns out, the NEA, clearly trying to minimize public awareness of an unprecedented infringement on parental prerogatives, tabled the resolution and announced a task force to study how best to approach LGBT issues in the schools. But in February 2002, the NEA board of directors approved the task force’s report—a pure emanation of the GLSEN worldview, as is clear both from its numerous citations of GLSEN documents in the footnotes and from its recommendations. Following the task force’s lead, the NEA will now struggle to expunge “heterosexism” from the consciousness of children in the classroom.

The queering of the public schools has perhaps advanced furthest in California, where a new state law requires public schools to teach all K–12 students (and K means five-year-olds) “to appreciate various sexual orientations.” ...at Hale Middle School in Los Angeles “12-year-olds were subjected to graphic descriptions of anal sex and tips on how to dispose of used condoms so parents don’t find out.”


Gud ta seez so meny konzerned peepoz tryin so hard ta lernz owa chillinz, eh?

For comprehensiveness, nothing beats a GLSEN-recommended resource manual distributed to all K–12 public schools in Saint Paul and Minneapolis. The manual presents an educational universe that filters everything through an LGBT lens... testing students to see where their attitudes lie toward sexual “difference” (mere tolerance is unacceptable; much better is “admiration” and, best of all, “nurturance”)..."

Meea tollrinze iz unakkzeptabo, eh? Likez, hooda thunkz, I ax ya?

How duz ya "nurchaz" a fag, zakly, I wunnaz? By lettin him fag ya up eny ole time he wanna, I spoze.